KU law professor co-writes Supreme Court amicus brief in Collins v. Mnuchin financial crisis case

Tuesday, December 08, 2020

LAWRENCE — The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments Dec. 9 in Collins v. Mnuchin, a case arising from the financial crisis of 2008. Alexander Platt, associate professor of law at the University of Kansas, co-wrote an amicus brief for the court and is available to discuss the case with media.

At issue is whether the government will be immune from legal accountability for actions taken under the banner of its emergency crisis-management authority, even for actions taken long after a crisis has faded. Four years after bailing out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac at the height of the financial crisis, the Federal Housing Finance Agency and U.S. Department of the Treasury changed the rules regarding how the private shareholders of those companies could be compensated when they make a profit, which prompted shareholders to sue, on grounds the changes were beyond the power of the FHFA. Platt, who specializes in the intersection of corporate and administrative law, can discuss the case, what the court’s ruling could mean for agencies and investors, and related topics. He co-wrote the brief with Steven Davidoff Solomon of the University of California-Berkeley and David Zaring of Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

The brief was written in support of plaintiff Patrick J. Collins. In it, the authors summarize the times the executive branch and independent agencies have been called upon to respond to economic crises, including in 2008 and 2009. They also illustrate how the Federal Reserve and Treasury are currently acting to help soften the economic blow of the COVID-19 pandemic. In such events, normal means of guaranteeing transparency and accountability are not regularly enforced, increasing chances of abuses of power. The agencies that made changes at the heart of the case represent such an abuse, the authors argue, and the courts should not shy away from.

“While broad discretion for the government to act in a time of crisis without litigious interference might be necessary, that does not mean the executive ought to be immune from any and all forms of legal accountability for unlawful actions forever after — especially those taken long after a crisis has faded,” Platt said. “Sadly, it seems likely that the current virus-driven economic crisis will not be our last. As the court turns this week to consider a case arising out of the last great economic crisis, we hope that it keeps the next one in mind.”

Platt’s work has been published in leading law journals and cited by the Eleventh Circuit Court. He teaches classes in contracts and securities regulation, and he has recently published research on the Securities and Exchange Commission illegally denying hearings to defendants and a “revolving door” between the agency and private law firms.

To schedule an interview, contact Mike Krings at 785-864-8860, mkrings@ku.edu or @MikeKrings.

Floyd Bledsoe shares what life is like 5 years after exoneration; he’s still pushing for accountability for his wrongful murder conviction

Brynlee Alice Jean Bledsoe is still too young to know the significance, but someday she’ll understand that her middle names are in honor of two of the women who helped free her father from prison in 2015.

Brynlee, who will turn 2 next month, and her two big brothers are making the time pass by much more quickly for Floyd Scott Bledsoe than it did as he spent almost 16 years behind bars.

This Tuesday, Dec. 8, will mark five years since Bledsoe, now 43, was released from prison after DNA and other evidence proved he did not murder his 14-year-old sister-in-law in 1999.

In Kansas, kids who face criminal charges aren't getting the defense they need, report says

The National Juvenile Defender Center says Kansas needs a statewide system for training and assigning defense attorneys to work with children.

Most of Wichita attorney Trent Wetta’s clients fall between the ages of 14 and 17, but they can be as young as 10. They typically face misdemeanor charges, such as possession of marijuana or theft, or minor felony charges, like burglary.

It can prove tricky guiding a child through a criminal justice system made by adults with law degrees.

Six steps to resolve the U.S.-China trade war

“We make first our habits, and then our habits make us.” 
- John Dryden (1631-1700) 

Since the Sino-American Trade War got underway in March 2018, America’s leaders have been developing anti-China, even anti-Chinese, habits. Since then, China’s leaders have retaliated with their own anti-U.S., and even anti-American, habits.

Will the adversarial way in which America and China are interacting become so deeply ingrained that they make their Trade War a habit and, if so, become implacable adversaries?

Health law expert joins KU Law faculty

SEC 13F threshold proposal may be down but not yet dead

On 10 July 2020, the SEC released for comment a proposed rule that would change the reporting threshold for Form 13F from $100 million to $3.5 billion for institutional investment managers. The SEC thought it was a good time to increase the threshold which was established 45 years ago to reflect the change in size and structure of the U.S. equities market and to increase the information provided by institutional investment managers by eliminating the omission threshold for individual securities, and requiring managers to provide additional identifying information.

Reclaiming the race analogy in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia

The Supreme Court held oral argument last week in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, a case asking whether a taxpayer-funded foster care agency may turn away same-sex couples who wish to be foster parents because of the agency’s sincere religious objection to certifying same-sex couples. A Philadelphia ordinance—the Fair Practices Ordinance—and the contract that a family foster care agency such as CSS must sign with the city prohibit such agencies from discriminating against these same-sex couples.

Questioning the need for qualified immunity

Rethinking the policy that shields police and government officials from civil lawsuits
Qualified immunity is a legal principle created by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1982. Now some are wondering if its use has been expanded beyond its original intent including two U.S. Supreme Court Justices asking the court to reconsider it.

  • Lumen Mulligan, Earl B. Shurtz Research Professor of Law at the University of Kansas


Subscribe to RSS - faculty